Flood narratives atomic number 18 present in both the Sumerian large of Gilgamesh and in the Bible and although they ar genuinely similar, they ar in any case very different. The Sumerian version of the overeat story is related to a polytheistic, antropocentric and fatalistic worldview, while the Hebrew myth is base on a mo nonheistic, theocentric and ethically casual worldview. The big rests are evident already from the start of the stories. While in the Bible, idol makes his restore decision about bringing down the flood, gods in Gilgamesh must hold a council to decide: the gods in promised land decided in their council... (Gilgamesh p. 63) And the Lord said, I entrust indite down art object whom I generate created... (the Bible p. 11 §7) This is the first gear version of the contrast between polytheistic and monotheistic worldviews. matinee idol in the Bible cannot hold a council as he does not have any unrivalled to consult with. In Gilgamesh gods cannot make sole decisions as they have special(a) powers and one god could not bring such a disaster on the men. Another indication of limited powers of the Sumerian gods is the size of the flood.
In Gilgamesh only one urban center is flooded while in the Bible every(prenominal) living matter is wiped out all over the existence: the gods in heaven decided in threi council to bring the flood down on the fortunate city. (Gilgamesh p. 66) And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the eart; (the Bible, p. 11 §7). Another cause of the difference between monotheism in the Bible and polytheism in Gilgamesh is t he difference betwen the tokens both survivo! urs get in the end. While Utnapishtim gets a amulet all for himself and also become immortal - is sure into the club of the gods, in... If you want to get a full essay, nine it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.